Thursday, September 22, 2016

Blame the Content, Not the Platform

Is reading Rich’s article “the intellectual equivalent of empty calories”? (Rich) Absolutely not. In the article, Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?, literacy practices are plentiful. As the advantages or disadvantages of online reading versus traditional reading are examined, the reader is fully engaged. This article entices the reader to comprehend and analyze the two different sides of the argument, develop their own thoughts, opinions, and biases and encourages a response. Just because this article is being read in an online platform, does not mean the content is somehow tainted or less than printed articles. It does not take away from the literacy experience in the least.

Multiliteracies
“Visual literacy, media literacy, critical literacy, computer literacy, and other types of literacies are brought together under this umbrella term to suggest the need to expand the concept of literacy beyond reading and writing print-based texts.” (Serafini, pg.26)
 As the article represents two very distinct viewpoints, one side of the debate claims that reading on the internet with its non-linear format has a negative impact on the development of literacy skills and comprehension. This viewpoint is severely outdated as is the purposely “R U” text speak in the title. Utilizing the internet is one of many platforms. The platform is defined as the place in which the information is accessed. There is an unlimited number of books, articles, journals, blogs, posts, and more that can be found and read online. These texts could be published by people of any age, demographic, or geographic location. Authors may be top scholars in their fields, while others may be people inclined to share their opinions. Many of these postings can be well written and do not contain shorthand text speak. The level of literacy relies solely on the content that is chosen and not on the internet platform.
 While the “traditionalists” encourage the use of offline printed books, they are overlooking the availability of these exact same literary works in an online platform. In the online form of reading, users are also able to extend their understanding further by seeking the viewpoints of others in a virtual setting or online forum. This also brings in a social element as they are learning from the perspectives of others. Perhaps they are even tapping into other forms of literacy as mentioned above by seeking out alternative forms or media regarding the topic they have been reading about such as images or videos. “Even those who are most concerned about the preservation of books acknowledge that children need a range of reading experiences.” (Rich) In this age of new media, we have already expanded the scope of literacy practices to include multiple “reading experiences” which extend far beyond printed text. (Rich)

Least Restrictive Reading
            “The Internet has created a new kind of reading, one that schools and society should not discount.” (Rich) Imagine being a student that has dyslexia. The teacher gives you a reading assignment and you open your hardcover printed book.  Upon opening the book, all of your focus goes to the font that is used since it is difficult to decipher. It becomes increasingly frustrating as you try to decode what is being said, you can only hope you are not called upon to read aloud.Some children with dyslexia or other learning difficulties, like Hunter Gaudet, 16, of Somers, Conn., have found it far more comfortable to search and read online.” (Rich) If this book were provided in an online platform, it may be much easier for students with dyslexia to comprehend. In the online version, the reader may be able to adjust the font type, the size, as well as the spacing. This is something that cannot be done with a printed traditional text.
            The same concept can also apply to English as a second language students or any second language learners. If students were provided both print and online versions of a text, they may be able to choose what is the most comfortable for them. Students may have a deepened sense of understanding if they could quickly and easily translate words and phrases they don’t understand using an online translation tool. They may also find visual images or graphs to assist in their literacy development.

Mixed Media
            “Web proponents believe that strong readers on the Web may eventually surpass those who rely on books. Reading five Web sites, an op-ed article and a blog post or two, experts say, can be more enriching than reading one book.” (Rich) An online environment provides further dimension because it holds mixed media such as text, imagery, videos, and more. The emergence and development of the digital age has certainly brought about a new wave of learning and literacy. Literacy skills should be consistently practiced and developed on multiple platforms. “Some literacy experts say that reading itself should be redefined.” (Rich) Instead of pinning one type of platform versus the other, it is even more important to combine the two mediums both print and online for a well-rounded literacy approach.

Reading online is reading too.




Citation:
Rich, M. (2008). Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading? Retrieved September 22, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html?pagewanted=all


Serafini, F. (n.d.). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy.

No comments:

Post a Comment