Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Interactive Whiteboards Paper Brief Summary


*Please note that all images belong to their rightful owners and were found using a google images search*


As this video is a brief summary of my final paper, the citation is the same which is:

Citation
Kent, P., & Holdway, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboards, productive pedagogies and literacy teaching. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 17(1), 21+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=nysl_ce_uticacol&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA195013275&asid=bc3925f874ad67e4a705177a451a13ce
*Closing and Determination of Benefits and Results*

Prinsloo, M., & Sasman, F. (2015). Literacy and Language Teaching and Learning With Interactive Whiteboards in Early Schooling. TESOL Quarterly49(3), 533-554. doi:10.1002/tesq.237. Retreived from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.library.esc.edu/eds/detail/detail?sid=fc52bd22-3994-4e6d-a64f-3b4b9c01a027%40sessionmgr101&vid=0&hid=104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=eue&AN=109464226  * Definition of whiteboard*

Murcia, Karen. (2014) Interactive and multimodal pedagogy: A case study of how teachers and students use interactive whiteboard technology in primary science. Australian Journal of Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275493518_Interactive_and_multimodal_pedagogy_A_case_study_of_how_teachers_and_students_use_interactive_whiteboard_technology_in_primary_science  * Multimodal/ Background information on IWB*

PDST. Professional Development Service for Teachers. Interactive Whiteboards- Focus on Literacy and Numeracy ( Primary) http://www.pdsttechnologyineducation.ie/en/Training/ICT-in-Classroom-PDFs/ICT-in-the-Classroom-PDFs/Interactive-Whiteboards-focus-on-literacy-and-numeracy-Primary-13-09.pdf 
*How teachers are using it and thought provoking questions Good For Closing Paragraph*

Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution : Teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, Vic: Australian Council for Education Research. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.utica.edu/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzI3OTgzNV9fQU41?sid=4bbaa782-4b87-48c7-8ed8-b065c13d3511@sessionmgr102&vid=0&format=EB&rid=1 *Case Examples*

 Schrock, Kathy. Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything. Literacy Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.schrockguide.net/uploads/3/9/2/2/392267/literacy_defintions.pdf*Literacy Definitions from Schrock*
Serafini, Frank. (2013). Reading the Visual: An Introduction to Teaching Multimodal Literacy. Teachers College Press. *Definitions*

Smith, AnnMarie. (2015).Five Things School Administrators Should Know About Critical Literacy. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.library.esc.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6e9ce51b-0ea7-4f07-9c0a-0a93df84a595%40sessionmgr4008&hid=4202&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=eue&AN=118640850  

Easton, Diane. Layering Literacy. John Hopkins School of Education. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/literacy/articles/layering-literacy/

with the addition of https://www.childcareexchange.com/catalog/product/learning-to-see-.-.-.-seeing-to-learn-the-role-of-...

Do Interactive Whiteboards Help Teachers Promote New Media Literacy Skills in the Digital Age?

Introduction
           Chalk boards in K-12 classrooms are largely extinct. With the rise of new media, chalkboards have been replaced by a more complex tool: interactive whiteboards (IWB). Interactive whiteboards “are large, touch-sensitive screens that control a computer that is connected both to a digital projector as well as to the internet.” (Prinsloo) In classrooms, teachers and students can manipulate, annotate and interact with items on the screen using their fingers, or specifically designed “pens”. Interactive whiteboards can be used with any content area to engage students. According to Karen Murcia, “digital technologies should be used in presenting a concept, exploring implications, placing the concept in various contexts, creating links with existing knowledge, and leading discussions that probe student understanding. It is evident in this statement that the significance of technologies such as the IWB in the classroom does not lie within the device itself but rather how it is used to enable interaction between users and resources in meaning making and knowledge construction.” (Murcia, pg. 76 digital pg.4) Along this line of thought, intentional teaching practices coupled with an interactive whiteboard can be applied to promote digital literacy skills in the classroom. To further review this concept, it is imperative to understand the idea of multimodal ensembles.

Multimodal Application
         Traditional literacy practices from the past were extremely text heavy as images were not easily produced. Now, in the digital age, we have become accustomed to “multimodal ensembles” which justify the need to teach and build strong digital literacy skills. (Serafini pg. 11) Serafini defined the concept of multimodal ensembles by explaining that it is: “A cohesive entity that uses a variety of semiotic resources, including written language, visual images, and design elements to represent and communicate ideas and meanings.” (Serafini, pg. 172) Since students are exposed to a large range of multimodal ensembles, it is crucial that they not only know how to analyze and make sense out of what they are seeing, but can also demonstrate their knowledge by creating an ensemble. On a large interactive whiteboard platform, teachers are able to display and utilize multimodal communications as they assist students in exploring works by using visual, critical, tool and information literacy skills. Several case reviews were analyzed as an example of digital literacy skills being promoted through an interactive whiteboard in the classroom.

Example 1: Kindergarten Teacher Louise Goold
     In the eBook “The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution” by Chris Betcher and Lee Mal, several teachers were interviewed and asked to describe the way they utilize their IWBs in the classroom. One teacher that provided input was Louise Goold of Sydney, Australia.
       Gold identified several ways that she integrates the interactive whiteboards into her lesson plans. One use that she identified in particular is using the board to help answer student inquiries. She provides the example of a student that asked what the term “breaching” meant after their recent lesson about whales. With new media practices, Goold decided to “maximize her teachable moments” in answering the students. (Betcher & Lee pgs. 122-123) Instead of verbally explaining the meaning of the word as applied to whales, she took to the interactive board instead. Goold asked her students:
“What do I need to click on to get to the internet?”
“What does images mean?”
“What images will I ask Google to search for?” (Betcher & Lee pgs. 122-123)
          After locating an image of a whale breaching the surface, she prompted students to explain what they were seeing. Multiple students provided answers that helped the class conclude the meaning of a breaching. Goold further stated her thoughts about using the interactive whiteboard by stating “in addition to making use of quality online resources, I can quickly generate meaningful teaching tools to support the acquisition of a particular concept.” (Betcher & Lee pgs. 122-123) While working on the concept breaching, Goold promoted information literacy as well as visual literacy practices.

Goold’s New Literacy Application
          Information literacy is the first skillset that Goold promoted in her kindergarten classroom. Information literacy is defined as being able to state a need for information, successfully search for it, analyze the results for credibility and then utilize the information that was found. (Schrock) In the example provided, the students clearly stated the need for information as they were curious to know the definition of breaching. Goold stepped in to facilitate identifying the steps that would need to be taken in order to find the answer. Students were able to direct the teacher to the proper icon that would bring up a web browser, and could provide ideas as to what phrasing could be entered into the google search. In reviewing the image results, one image was selected for further analyzation.
          Another literacy area that Goold incorporated involved visual literacy. Kathy Schrock defines visual literacy as “the skillset and abilities to understand and produce visual images.” (Schrock) In Frank Serafini’s book, Reading the Visual, he describes Averinou’s “points of convergence” to further define visual literacy. The convergence points note that visual literacy is a “cognitive ability” and “competency” that is both “learnable and teachable”.  Serafini adds an additional layer of explanation in stating that “visual literacy is about the process of generating interpretations from the meaning potentials available when transacting with visual images and multimodal ensembles.”  (Serafini, pg.23) With these definitions in mind, it is clear that Goold promoted digital literacy in the following ways.
        As the picture of a whale breaching the surface was cast onto the interactive whiteboard, Goold asked the children to look carefully at the image and describe their thoughts. Several students generated their own interpretations as one answered “it’s jumping out of the water”, another answered “it looks like it’s leaping” and a third student suggested “it’s not doing a belly flop, but doing a back flop.” (Betcher & Lee pgs. 122-123)  From the teacher’s prompt, students were able to use their visual skills to cognitively create their own perspectives regarding the image. While the first answer was the most accurate to define breaching, all three students were practicing how to arrive at the answer using visual literacy skills. The third responder was also able to link to his or her existing fund of knowledge in stating that the whale appeared to be doing a “back flop”. (Betcher & Lee pgs. 122-123 This skill assists students in making deeper connections with the material at hand.
     The elements of the lesson above would not have been so easily accessible using the traditional teaching tools. They would not have been able to pull up an image so quickly without the technology to do so. With the teacher’s model and guidance through the interactive whiteboard, students were able to participate collaboratively to develop their skills. The skillsets utilized will help to build a foundation of visual and information literacy practices moving forward as the eventual goal is for students to complete such tasks independently as they advance.

Example 2: Elementary School Teacher Paula White
     Another teacher that provided input, as noted in Chris Betcher and Lee Mal’s book, was elementary school teacher Paula White from Virginia. White described her lesson involving analyzing different sources of information.
      White’s classroom is given a task to review a topic usually regarding a historical event. As an event is selected, the teacher will display a Wikipedia page that captures details of the occurrence. Wikipedia is selected so that students can “explore issues of authenticity and accuracy” (Betcher & Lee pgs. 118-120) Two students in the class are provided with Airliner slates. These slates allow them to annotate the text displayed on the interactive whiteboard from anywhere in the room. Students are asked to “silently read the text, and note vocabulary that may be an issue for or interesting to them.” (Betcher & Lee pg. 119)  They are also asked to summarize the resource into one topic sentence. One student with an Airliner slate annotates the resource on the interactive whiteboard while other students use their notebooks. When each student has finished their work, the class reviews the work that the student has displayed on the board. The class discusses their own thought processes as well as what the student with the Airliner slate has portrayed to the class. After a full discussion and teacher facilitation, the second student with an Airliner slate is assigned the same set of tasks, this time using input and guidance from all members of the class. White goes on to further explain her thoughts about the activity. “Sharing this thinking about their thinking provides models for less-experienced students to note that successful summarizers pay attention to things such as text features, the connections a reader makes and the vocabulary in the text so that they can use it or find synonyms as they restate the material in their own words. Students learn to question what is unclear, seek clarification and analyze a text/topic to uncover what is central…” (Betcher & Lee pgs. 118-120)
White’s New Literacy Application
       The lesson that White has described promotes critical literacy skills. Critical literacy is defined as “the ability to question, challenge, and evaluate the meanings and purposes of texts.” (Schrock) According to Ann Marie Smith, “research supports that critical literacy practices in the classroom improve student reading comprehension.” (Smith pg. 1) This is a great way to incorporate the multiliteracies approach, as the skill set can be used in the traditional or the new media sense. (Serafini, pg. 26) If it weren’t for critical literacy skills, we may not be able to determine fact from fiction. Although the lines can be blurred at times, it is necessary for students to carefully analyze the information that they are receiving to avoid misinformation.
       In the example above, it’s extremely interesting that White often uses Wikipedia as a source of information, but she does so purposefully. Wikipedia has been the recipient of much criticism as the information provided is not always credible. White chooses this source so that students can practice their critical literacy skillset. As she stated she wants students to inquire about the accuracy of what they are exposed to instead of believing everything they come across. (Betcher & Lee pgs. 118-120) One of the tasks the students are given is to summarize the main idea of what they are reading. This serves to evaluate the purpose of the text. If they carried on the lesson further they may also perform more in depth challenges and responses to the work as well. (Betcher & Lee pgs. 118-120)
             The interactive whiteboard is also a crucial element in this lesson. Not only is the teacher modeling critical and information literacy practices when navigating the search to find the article, but she is also scaffolding to meet the needs of every student. In the traditional sense this activity would have to be done independently as the webpage would have to be printed out beforehand and given to every student. On the interactive whiteboard, students are able to annotate and navigate freely, as struggling students look on to see how another student is performing. White brings in a collaborative element as she asks students to explain their logic and reasoning which also helps students that may find this activity to be difficult. The other task the students were given was to find vocabulary that was challenging for them or interesting to them. Independently, using the Airliner slate, the student could look up the word that caused confusion, or it could be done as a class. As elementary school students, this is a great practice to further develop their critical literacy skills. (Betcher & Lee pgs. 118-120)

Example 3: Elementary and High School teacher Katie Morrow
      The last example that will be reviewed from Betcher and Lee’s eBook, is Katie Morrow who has had experience teaching both elementary school and high school. Morrow described an activity that she has created for her 5th grade students in Nebraska.
         Students were assigned to work collaboratively to create a school news program. The students were responsible for every aspect of the show, they had to choose the content, record and edit segments, and put it all together to produce a finished product. Morrow further explains that the interactive whiteboard was utilized by students to complete the following tasks: “large group brainstorming, developing news story assignments, concept mapping to plan each episode’s flow, editing and revising to proofread word-processed stories, creating a teleprompt feature, editing the production using iMovie, constructively critique the work as a group.” (Betcher & Lee pg.110)

       Morrow’s lesson was purposefully designed to incorporate new media literacy skills as she states “sending our students into the twenty first century as primarily passive receivers of information will not give them the skills needed to compete in an ever-changing global society as students today thrive being able to create, contribute, and collaborate with the world around them.” (Betcher & Lee pg.110) Morrow goes on to further explain that the interactive whiteboard is for students to “produce content, rather than just consume it”. (Betcher & Lee pg.110)
 Morrow’s Media Application     
          The activity described above focuses a great deal on tool literacy while also containing elements of critical, visual, and information literacy. Tool literacy is defined as the “skillset to use tools to manage, organize, and create information”. (Schrock) Tool literacy also works to “facilitate all other literacies” which is exactly what is being fostered in the example. (Easton)   
      In looking more closely at the assigned tasks, one item involved selecting content. To be able to select content the students must first identify the need for information and then effectively search for it which falls under information literacy practices. After the resource, has been located, students must rely on their critical literacy skills to determine if it is a credible resource that can be utilized for their project. The students practiced visual literacy skills as they created recordings and edited segments as they had to be sure that the shots they took pertained the message being provided. Throughout the entire project, tool literacy skills are showcased since students were able to understand how to use the software and the hardware needed to meet the needs of their assignment. This is a great combination of skills that students will surely utilize in current times and in the future.

Conclusion
    Due to the multimodal nature of new media in the digital age, it is imperative for students to develop strong information, visual, critical and tool literacy skills. “To promote higher-order thinking, teachers need to create classroom activities that allow students to manipulate information, to explore ideas and their implications, and to construct their own knowledge.”
( Kent & Hold way pg.22) In the examples provided, it has been shown that interactive whiteboards when coupled with intentional teaching as noted in the above quote, do help teachers promote digital literacy skills in the classroom setting.
           While the purposefully designed, lessons that were reviewed in the examples were geared toward new media literacy skills, there are several other factors about the interactive whiteboards to assist teachers as they assist their students. According to the Professional Development Service for Teachers, there are several benefits of utilizing an interactive whiteboard in the classroom setting. One benefit (as shown in the examples) is accessibility to multimodal resources, the IWB allows easy access to audio clips, videos, images, and texts. Another benefit is that it is a shared resource that can be used for group inclusion. (PDST) It is imperative to note that there are a number of possibilities when it comes to utilizing interactive whiteboards in the classroom, as it is not limited to the new media literacy skills reviewed in this paper. Interactive whiteboards can help teachers navigate through any goals they choose.







Citation
Kent, P., & Holdway, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboards, productive pedagogies and literacy teaching. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 17(1), 21+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=nysl_ce_uticacol&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA195013275&asid=bc3925f874ad67e4a705177a451a13ce
*Closing and Determination of Benefits and Results*

Prinsloo, M., & Sasman, F. (2015). Literacy and Language Teaching and Learning With Interactive Whiteboards in Early Schooling. TESOL Quarterly49(3), 533-554. doi:10.1002/tesq.237. Retreived from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.library.esc.edu/eds/detail/detail?sid=fc52bd22-3994-4e6d-a64f-3b4b9c01a027%40sessionmgr101&vid=0&hid=104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=eue&AN=109464226  * Definition of whiteboard*

Murcia, Karen. (2014) Interactive and multimodal pedagogy: A case study of how teachers and students use interactive whiteboard technology in primary science. Australian Journal of Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275493518_Interactive_and_multimodal_pedagogy_A_case_study_of_how_teachers_and_students_use_interactive_whiteboard_technology_in_primary_science  * Multimodal/ Background information on IWB*

PDST. Professional Development Service for Teachers. Interactive Whiteboards- Focus on Literacy and Numeracy ( Primary) http://www.pdsttechnologyineducation.ie/en/Training/ICT-in-Classroom-PDFs/ICT-in-the-Classroom-PDFs/Interactive-Whiteboards-focus-on-literacy-and-numeracy-Primary-13-09.pdf 
*How teachers are using it and thought provoking questions Good For Closing Paragraph*

Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution : Teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, Vic: Australian Council for Education Research. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.utica.edu/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzI3OTgzNV9fQU41?sid=4bbaa782-4b87-48c7-8ed8-b065c13d3511@sessionmgr102&vid=0&format=EB&rid=1 *Case Examples*

 Schrock, Kathy. Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything. Literacy Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.schrockguide.net/uploads/3/9/2/2/392267/literacy_defintions.pdf*Literacy Definitions from Schrock*
Serafini, Frank. (2013). Reading the Visual: An Introduction to Teaching Multimodal Literacy. Teachers College Press. *Definitions*

Smith, AnnMarie. (2015).Five Things School Administrators Should Know About Critical Literacy. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.library.esc.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6e9ce51b-0ea7-4f07-9c0a-0a93df84a595%40sessionmgr4008&hid=4202&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=eue&AN=118640850  


Easton, Diane. Layering Literacy. John Hopkins School of Education. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/literacy/articles/layering-literacy/

Saturday, December 10, 2016

Promoting Digital Literacies in the Classroom: A Guide for High School Teachers

Purpose
This document is to help teachers evaluate resources that they can use in the classroom to promote digital literacy skills. The guide utilizes the backwards planning model. (Alber) The goals are determined first and then a lesson plan can be developed based around which goal is being addressed. The scope of the selected goals is most relevant to the school setting that it will be used for, and not limited to information literacy. Instead, a few literacy types were chosen with focus areas to assist teachers in facilitating a multiliteracy approach. (Serafini pg.26) As Kathy Schrock states “these literacies are not taught as separate literacies but are taught across the content areas.” (Schrock)

Student Goals
Broad Literacy Type
Focus Area
Student Objectives
Examples of Tools

Information Literacy

Citation Sources 1,8
Research
define need for information
EBSCO Host
successfully use devices to access material needed
Computer, iPad, Whiteboard
evaluate information for clarity, content, and legitimacy
Google Scholar
apply and share information appropriately
Social Media, Email, Dropbox
properly cite all sources
Citefast
Visual Literacy


Citation Source 8,10
Comprehend
understand purpose of imagery and intended message
YouTube
analyze alternate and hidden meanings
Prezi
validate and question visuals
PowerPoint
Create
identify topic to portray visually
PowToon
analyze and select proper tool to utilize for visual creation
Adobe Creative Suite
locate and manipulate images often in conjunction with text to produce cohesive work
Wordle
Critical Literacy

Citation Sources
2,3,4,5,8,9,11
Critique
determine the tone and type of work - narrative, persuasive, factual, descriptive
Online Periodicals, Blogs, News Sites, Satirical Sites
question content with attention to opinionated or biased excerpts- challenge expressed ideas
Review Articles about a Product, Political Sources
Media Literacy
Citation Sources
8, 10
Convention
evaluate how and why content is created and arranged to produce a message- target audience
Social Media, Email, Discussion Groups, Forums, Text messages
Platform
analyze and determine how the platform impacts communication style

Instructor Facilitation
Now that a few student goals have been identified, here are some items to consider about resources to use in the classroom.


1.Goal Identification
                Before analyzing resources, it is important to choose which literacy goal is going to be addressed. Literacy lessons should be incorporated into curriculum content.
Answer questions such as:
§  Is the goal academically and age appropriate?
§  Has the student mastered this literacy skill set or are they just beginning to learn it?
§  If needed, can the goal be completed with scaffolding?
§  What content material will work well with the selected literacy goal?

2.Resource Selection & Evaluation
The web has an unlimited amount of resources that are available to use on a range of devices. Here are a few things to considered when choosing a resource.
Evaluation Questions to Consider
Reasoning
Does the source narrow down specific topic information?
It's important that designated topics are fully covered while working on literacy goals.
Is the author trying to sell or advertise something?                     Is it from an open source that allows anyone to edit? 


Citation Sources 1,3,4
It could taint the message. If the content is tainted with biases, falsifications, or exaggerations use it as a critical literacy exercise. Have students analyze the above elements.
Is the content written at the appropriate grade level?

Citation Sources 1,7,8,9
If the material is too difficult for students, it may be hard for them to focus on the topic being reviewed along with building literacy skills.
How current is the work?
Citation Sources 1, 2, 3
Outdated information may be difficult for students to relate to.
Does the source contain imagery that supports the message?                          
Citation Resource 10
Students may need visual support to better interpret content material.

3.Tool Selection
 Now that you have analyzed resources, it is time to determine which platform is the best fit.
Student Strengths
Best Tool Option
Reasoning
works independently
iPad, Desktop Computer
Allows the student to explore digital literacies and content on their own
works better with peers
Interactive White Board
Easily seen by group of students- no pressure as some students are nervous performing when they are one-on-one with instructors
*Be mindful of any students that may fall into the “participation gap” that do not have internet access at home. Offer time for students to use resources before, during, and after school hours.











Citation
    Association of College and Research Libraries. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency

   Cornell University Digital Literacy Resource. Source Evaluation Checklist. Retrieved from https://digitalliteracy.cornell.edu/tutorial/dpl3221.html

Cornell University Library. Critically Analyzing Information Sources. Critical Appraisal Analysis.

Critical Literacy in the 21st Century. What is Critical Literacy. Retrieved from 

5.       Hughes, Janette. Teaching Language and Literacy. Critical Literacy Retrieved from http://faculty.uoit.ca/hughes/Contexts/CriticalLiteracy.html

6.       Louisiana Department of Education. Building Digital Literacy. Retrieved from https://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/default-source/teacher-toolbox-resources/digital-literacy-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=6


7.       Schrock, Kathy. Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything. Literacies for the Digital Age. Retrieved from http://www.schrockguide.net/literacy-in-the-digital-age.html

8.       Schrock, Kathy. Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything. Literacy Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.schrockguide.net/uploads/3/9/2/2/392267/literacy_defintions.pdf


9.       Schrock, Kathy. Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything. Critical Evaluation of a Website. Retrieved from http://www.schrockguide.net/uploads/3/9/2/2/392267/evalteacher.pdf

.   Serafini, FrankReading the Visual: An Introduction to Teaching Multimodal Literacy. Teachers College Press.

 Time 4 Writing. Types of Essays: End the Confusion. Retrieved from

 Warlick, David. Evaluating Internet-based Information. A Goals-based Approach. Retrieved from

.    Alber, Rebecca. Edutopia. Backwards Planning Takes Thinking Ahead. Retrieved from   https://www.edutopia.org/blog/backwards-planning-thinking-ahead-rebecca-alber